This is my post translated from russian to english I dont speak english well enough and text is very long so I used Google Translator Hope you will like it because is interesting
Before the main start of four years there is a natural desire to bring a
total of times past. There comes a time to talk about witness what we
did have and somehow compile it, lead to a common denominator, and since
these positions to look at the birth of new stars at the Olympics, the
emergence of new leaders, or the overthrow of the seemingly immutable
volleyball authority. In the following topics:
http://forum.belogorievolley.ru/viewtopic.php?t=2903
http://forum.belogorievolley.ru/viewtopic.php?t=1921
We discussed the balance of power among the Russian doigrovschikov.
In this topic, we summed up the year:
http://forum.belogorievolley.ru/viewtopic.php?t=2491
However,
we did nothing and did not mention the most important people on the
volleyball court. And it's not the boys who wipe the floor after a fall.
I propose to talk about a kind of generalized ranking pasuyuschih for
the past 4 years. Be objective, for each of the rating if it exists, it
looks differently, but some similarities to different ratings will slip,
and this can be considered true in some approximation.
Those who
are not going to read written below, I will ask just to name a top
five, in their opinion, pasuyuschih over the past 4 years. Possibly with
brief explanations. Or, as I suggested below, exposing the assessment
on a 10-point scale for each element of the game.
Before we
proceed to rankings, I wanted to say this about anything. Pasuyuschego
game, as I once wrote you can, like any other game player, valued at
three indicators: the achievements of his team, according to statistics
of its games and using visual assessment of how he performs the required
elements.
But often a good passer played in a team with
absolutely zero-hitters, this is the case, for example, in the national
team of Belgium. In contrast, powerful hitters show good results and
with the primitive pasuyuschim, as is the case with the national team of
Bulgaria.
On the other hand, the game statistics pasuyuschego thing
is not very reliable and can be treated differently. Someone looks at
the number of errors, someone on the number of cast gears, but it is
very poorly reflects the actual skill of him as a player. Perhaps the
number is donated would be a good indicator, but there must be taken not
to exclude balls with big passes to set off with bad reception. Somehow
take into account his teamwork with players, ease of transmission for
each player. Does he have a chance to take attacker without power or
driven it to the sideline. All this makes the current statistical
estimates are extremely unreliable and controversial.
In this regard,
the most complete assessment pasuyuschego will be an assessment by
visual observation of his game. Denote the most faithful and the optimal
algorithm that assessment.
Approximately 60% of game quality
pasuyuschego just with his ability to make the transfer, which, in
general, it is logical. But this skill, one of the toughest in
volleyball, is complex and requires an assessment on several factors:
1)
The stability / fidelity. One of the most important indicators.
However, not having them in the proper degree, the players can be stars
of first magnitude. For example, Lloyd Ball often suffers allotted
transfers, or on the contrary induced on the grid. And Pavel Zaitsev
folds much more precisely the American volleyball players. Another thing
is that the negative effect of such transfers is fully compensated by
his experience, speed transmissions, high removal. That's why probably
most appreciate Boll higher than Zaitsev. In the same paragraph, we can
talk about teamwork with his colleagues on the team, and so important as
how to play the tempo, the ability to give a hand in the transfer of
striker first rate. This implies a sense of the tempo of another player,
an understanding of what he expects.
2) The height of pickup ball
with PACE - can give a very fast transmission without loss of speed and
stability. The presence of this quality at pasuyuschego - a definite
plus, but his absence is not a particular disadvantage, although now
many young pasuyuschie are sometimes up to 2 meters: Ivan Zaitsev,
Shulgin, Camejo.
3) Speed pass - a competing measure to the
stability, because stable transmission is much easier to give a high
parabola than prostrelnoy trajectory. And that, in general, determines
the existence of two basic paradigms volleyball strategy: our speed and
Brazil. Again, neither one nor the other extreme cases are not bad, good
that the type of game that brings a winning team, he was elected,
that's all.
4) Vision site / variability of transmission - the
ability to reflect pasuyuschego keep your player without a block or a
torn box. And, it should be noted that dignity is not entirely related
to the rate of transmission, because Some of our young talent issue
their prostrelnye understated transfer directly to the double block of
the enemy. But this skill is undoubtedly correlated with Raman and
improvisation games the team as a whole.
5) Ability to play the
downed hiring and exit velocity for the ball - can be very helpful when
the enemy desperately at risk for filing and receiving the ball barely
cling to the reception, or just knock it up. Then all the confidence to
solve the issue pasuyuschim transmission over the entire area to its
attackers.
6) Experience / authority / leadership quality player - he
can give their best in games with strong opponents. Ie to take the game
thread in their hands and not lose his head in difficult situations,
when the opponent begins to prevail. The best quality of the player
beginning to emerge in the most crucial matches of the season, that's
when he hits all his virtuosity, coolness, improvisational component of
the game ...
The remaining 40%, relatively speaking, assess skills not related to his role. It is easy to guess that we are talking about:
7) feed
block
9) protection at a time when the passer is on the back of the line
10) own offensive actions.
Optionally,
under each item to give to 10% quality. It is rather conventional, it
is about pasuyuschem as simply a neutral field players. Due to the fact
that it is very difficult to make an accurate assessment of each player
on a ten scale, I'm in my ranking will evaluate only the strengths and
weaknesses pasuyuschih without conducting an assessment of their fine is
not too pronounced skills (but are on very good level)
.Rating:
1. My personal sympathies on the side of the player,
which I pretty not only for its human qualities, but that just struck me
as a volleyball player when I thought I'd be surprised is there is
nothing. His victory - a first victory in his club. Only once the French
team when it won third place at World Championship 2002. It is a Luke
de Kergre or more formally - THIEBAUT DE KERGRET, Loïc. He is a true
leader in any team, which plays. He pulls his team is literally a force
to victory. Suffice it to recall the Champions League final game 06-07,
when he certainly deserved MVP. But too much effort gave the command to
fight an incredibly powerful part of the Moscow Dynamo. So I still can
not understand how there was that victory, as it has been possible in
principle, a purely mathematical basis of probability theory. How they
won in the 2004-2005 season with 1 / 8 finals of the first brilliant
"Piacenza" with Grbic to PACE, a jumpy Marshall, the young Anderson,
Hristo Zlatanov, Bovolentoy and Bott on the blocks and libero Sergio?
Then drove the Russians from Paris-Volley, and ripped into the final
Greek giants of Thessaloniki ... Game De Kergre distinguished primarily
by speed, although it is not supernatural, but as part of European
tradition. He is not trying to take too high. Playing is almost always
in the tempo and the players are almost never underestimates. Accurately
enough, although sometimes devotes far from the grid, but only for
those who are not critical, such as Nikolova. One of the most brilliant
of his features - the ability to give a decent transfer with any
admission. Although curled over the net, though creeping along the
ground. Especially characteristic of his understated style to give
reference to a completely unpredictable direction when literally no way
out for the free transfer of the unit. One of the manifestations of its
phenomenal integration into the team game - a great game in defense,
probably the best among all other pasuyuschih. He brilliantly hedging
his unit. Has good coordination and therefore sometimes lack the balls
on the run, catching them with one hand, it was in the final Champions
League 04.05. He has middling hard block. I remember how he blocked
three Zlatanov match with Piacenza. He has a sharp, tactical delivery,
sometimes he shortens suddenly. Rarely goes after the match without the
two goals scored in their own attack. Also incredibly together and
quickly played with the first rate at any reception.