You are not logged in.

  • "serdar" is male

Posts: 3,161

Favourite Team: Cuban NT, Turkish NT, VAKIFBANK

Favourite Players: A. Orro/O. Malinov/H. Miyashita/X. Gong/T. Boskoviç/M. Vargas/P. Egonu/I. Haak/H. Klimets/Z. Ting/C. Zhang/Gabi/B. Busa/M. Sylla/C. Bosetti/I. Voronkova/K. Ilchenko/D. Santana/J. Geerties/C. Plak/M. Mlejnkova/A. Leyva/L. Scuka/C. van Gestel/B. Herbotts/N. Daalderop/C. Chirichella/I. Fetisova/K. Akman/M. Popoviç/A. Danesi/S. Bonifacio/Y. Xinyue/Z. Todorova/A. De Tant

Location: Rotterdam, Netherlands

  • Send private message

221

Saturday, June 17th 2017, 1:46pm

There is no other federation who tries to screw his own sport more than FIVB :wall: Jump servers already fading away due to new ball, now they are trying to wipe it out :aww:

Matthias

Setter & Coach

  • "Matthias" is male

Posts: 15,342

Location: Germany

  • Send private message

222

Friday, June 30th 2017, 4:18pm

Guidetti gave a short statement to German press about the things that will be tested. He says that the coaching commission to which he also belongs made some propositions to FIVB, but what will be tested now has nothing to do with those. The coaches don't need rule changes, but FIVB wants the game to be shorter and have less mistakes to be more interesting for TV. He thinks that the serve and backrow attack changes would kill the game.

  • "le coq gaulois" is male

Posts: 466

Favourite Team: Béziers Angels

Favourite Players: Ludmila Da Silva, Osmokrovic,Svetlana Dukule, Aleesha Deesing,Nootsara Tomkom, Fe Garay

Location: France

  • Send private message

223

Friday, June 30th 2017, 4:27pm

as always , he's smart ...and fivb smartless !
Les pieds dans le fumier, mais toujours le verbe haut et la tête droite ! Cocorico !

  • "Meatballs" is male

Posts: 2,046

Favourite Team: Galatasaray, Turkish NT Women

Favourite Players: Gamze Alikaya, Kim Yeon-koung, Milena Rasic, Isabelle Haak, Saori Kimura

Location: Sweden

Occupation: Setter

  • Send private message

224

Sunday, July 23rd 2017, 12:41pm

This is not a suggestion about the game rules but about statistics, particularly for "Best setters statistics. It looks quite unfair when they use a formula based on only running sets, still sets and number of setting errors. Number of running sets highly depend on how your team receives. I think there will be a very fair number and order if they simply add Excellent receives as percentage to the formula.

In an example, imagine that setter A got 10 points and settter B got 5 points today, however Team A has %60 excellent receives and Team B has only %10 excellent receives. With these percentages added, setter A will very likely have a lower point than setter B.

Posts: 1,026

Favourite Team: M: USA, Serbia, Italy,Russia, Perugia, PGE Skra, Taubate W: Brazil, Japan, Serbia, wherever club Queen Sheilla is at...

Favourite Players: M: Maxim Mikhaylov, Murilo, Serginho, Aaron Russell, Otavio,Micah Christenson, Simone Giannelli, Ivan Zaytsev, Tsvetan Sokolov, Michał Kubiak, Mariusz Wlazly, Pawel Zagummy W: Sheilla, Zhu Ting, Natalia, Fe Garay, Fofao, Gabi, Thaisa, Foluke Akinradewo, Haruka Miyashita, Wei Qiuyue, Ding Xia, Carli Lloyd, Fabi, Natalia Goncharova, Yuko Sano, Saoris Kimura and Sakoda

  • Send private message

225

Sunday, July 23rd 2017, 1:49pm

If there's a rule I want to change...I really wish the libero can legally attack from the backrow without the net height limit. Just seems so absurd. I think as long as it's not a downward spike... Everything should be totally fine for everyone. :white:

brahmin

Master

  • "brahmin" is male

Posts: 2,755

Favourite Team: USA Men NT, USA Women NT, Japan Women NT

  • Send private message

226

Sunday, July 23rd 2017, 9:19pm

This is not a suggestion about the game rules but about statistics, particularly for "Best setters statistics. It looks quite unfair when they use a formula based on only running sets, still sets and number of setting errors. Number of running sets highly depend on how your team receives. I think there will be a very fair number and order if they simply add Excellent receives as percentage to the formula.

In an example, imagine that setter A got 10 points and settter B got 5 points today, however Team A has %60 excellent receives and Team B has only %10 excellent receives. With these percentages added, setter A will very likely have a lower point than setter B.


I have created a net assists calculation.

First part (Kills - hitting errors)
Second part Mulitply by (player sets played/team sets played, if a sub use 0.5 versus a starter of 1.0)
Third part Multiply by (running + standing sets)/set attempts (minus setting errors)
Lastly divide by player sets played

This will give an estimated value of the total spike kills that the setter contributed in total and then to their team per set. If the setter plays more, they have a greater affect.
You can have a negative value, so the setter made some bad decisions.

brahmin

Master

  • "brahmin" is male

Posts: 2,755

Favourite Team: USA Men NT, USA Women NT, Japan Women NT

  • Send private message

227

Sunday, July 23rd 2017, 9:21pm

If there's a rule I want to change...I really wish the libero can legally attack from the backrow without the net height limit. Just seems so absurd. I think as long as it's not a downward spike... Everything should be totally fine for everyone. :white:


I would love to see the liberos given points for their digs landing on the other side of the net. They used to do it, but not any more.

  • "le coq gaulois" is male

Posts: 466

Favourite Team: Béziers Angels

Favourite Players: Ludmila Da Silva, Osmokrovic,Svetlana Dukule, Aleesha Deesing,Nootsara Tomkom, Fe Garay

Location: France

  • Send private message

228

Thursday, September 21st 2017, 6:47pm

sorry , this article is on french , but some interesting informations about new rules that was tested in WCU23 : http://infostourainesport.fr/2017/09/vol…uvelles-regles/
Les pieds dans le fumier, mais toujours le verbe haut et la tête droite ! Cocorico !

Kk15

Master

  • "Kk15" is female

Posts: 2,583

Favourite Team: Italian NTs – Trento – Foppa

Location: Italy

  • Send private message

229

Thursday, September 21st 2017, 8:03pm

Interesting, thanks.

For me, not considering for a second all the other problematics/advantages (there are both,imho), that may be enough to consider the experiment as a failure:

Quoted

Durée de match la plus courte: 43 minutes
Durée moyenne des matchs: 1 heure et 17 minutes

I really can't see how shorter matches can help volleyball. Is there actually someone that enjoy a 45 minutes match more than a match that generally is at least 1.15h long, even with a 3-0?
Imaging paying the ticket for a 45 minutes match... And there are people that drive let's say 1 hours to go to the arena, and 1 hour to go back...


The things I like of the formula is that with a shorter set the points matter almost since the beginning of the set (while a 4-0 start isn't that scary in a 25 point set, for example).
On the other hand, I'm afraid we would pay too much in term of lasting of the match (too short) and chances of inverting a result inside a single set. It's also true that a come back during a 15 points set it would be even more epic, as it is when a regular tie break is won after losing 3-8, or 5-10 – to make example that I saw happen. The problem is that happen quite rarely, especially in the male volleyball.

  • "serdar" is male

Posts: 3,161

Favourite Team: Cuban NT, Turkish NT, VAKIFBANK

Favourite Players: A. Orro/O. Malinov/H. Miyashita/X. Gong/T. Boskoviç/M. Vargas/P. Egonu/I. Haak/H. Klimets/Z. Ting/C. Zhang/Gabi/B. Busa/M. Sylla/C. Bosetti/I. Voronkova/K. Ilchenko/D. Santana/J. Geerties/C. Plak/M. Mlejnkova/A. Leyva/L. Scuka/C. van Gestel/B. Herbotts/N. Daalderop/C. Chirichella/I. Fetisova/K. Akman/M. Popoviç/A. Danesi/S. Bonifacio/Y. Xinyue/Z. Todorova/A. De Tant

Location: Rotterdam, Netherlands

  • Send private message

230

Friday, September 22nd 2017, 1:54am

To me, both serving line and 15 points sets are failure. I only would like to keep one technical time out at 12th point and less time breaks in between sets to reduce "dead time" :whistle:

samsara

enthusiast

  • "samsara" is male

Posts: 632

Favourite Team: Chinese NT (W)

Favourite Players: Zhu Ting, Zhang Changning, Yuan Xinyue, Xu Yunli, Yan Ni, Zeng Chunlei, Wei Qiuyue, Ding Xia, Hui Ruoqi, Gong Xiangyu, Liu Xiaotong, Lin Li

Location: ASIA

Occupation: Self-employed

  • Send private message

231

Friday, September 22nd 2017, 4:52am

The Federation should REDUCE the rules to the minimum level with one sole principle in mind -- HOW TO keep the ball in play and make the game more interesting to watch without all those silly faults caused by various small detailed rules like those faults related to the center line etc etc..... In short they should review the rules and make that sport simpler.

I want to see the players focusing on the play, keeping the ball afloat not touching the floor, instead of memorizing all the kinds of miniscule rules.... reduce the rules, reduce the level of human's subjectivity (umpires' subjective interferences).

Just try to apply the KISS principle.... "Keep it simple, stupid"

"The majority of men are not capable of thinking, but only of believing and are not accessible to reason but only to authority." -­ Arthur Schopenhauer

This post has been edited 1 times, last edit by "samsara" (Sep 22nd 2017, 5:08am)


jetmasters

shoryuken

Posts: 168

Favourite Players: reliable, little apple, baby, cosmo, little ant, moon goddess, little sunflower, big sister, shopkeeper, military guard, big flower bud, rachel, big liu, west lake min

  • Send private message

232

Friday, September 22nd 2017, 5:12am

Game rules are fine. Just need to change qualification rules to make competition better.

theloneracer

Intermediate

Posts: 263

Location: Sydney Australia

  • Send private message

233

Friday, September 22nd 2017, 9:25am

Currently, there are 2 technical timeouts in each set at 8 & 16 points (except for the 5th set) and 2 team timeouts. I would like to see 3 technical timeouts in each set (except for 5th set) at 7, 14, 21 points and only 1 team timeout. The 5th set technical timeout can either be at 7 points or stay the same at 8 points as it currently is.

With 3 technical timeouts, the benefits for broadcaster are that they have more ads breaks at more regular intervals. The extra technical timeout is to compensate for the team timeout that is taken away. Also, I feel that most teams would call a timeout between 20 to 23 points when it crunches time so having a technical timeout at 21 points make sense.

The other reason as to why there should only be 1 team timeout is because of the 2 challenges given to each team. These days the coaches sometime used these challenges as extra timeouts. Taking away 1 team timeout will help prevent the match from dragging out the overall match time.

Kk15

Master

  • "Kk15" is female

Posts: 2,583

Favourite Team: Italian NTs – Trento – Foppa

Location: Italy

  • Send private message

234

Friday, September 22nd 2017, 10:03am

I completely disagree, please cut off all the the techincal time outs!!!
The pauses for the video check (potentially infinite) and the discretional time outs (I would keep them both) are definitely enough.

I would also get rid of the net fault, except the fault on the top and bottom and those faults that interfiere with the game (referee discretion about it).
I would get rid also of the top and bottom fault, actually xD

Social bookmarks