Hi Everybody !
The ITA league is now half its way: a timely moment to make some considerations supported by some evidence.
( 1) Up to now, Numbers tell this is the most balanced and hard-fought 'campionato' in the decade.
** Pesaro gets the leadership scoring 24 pts. (wins7-Loss 4; average 2,18 pts per match).
** Last year Pesaro led with 25 pts. (wins 8-Loss 3); in 2007-2008 they scored 30 pts. (wins 10-Loss:1).
I do not consider year 2008-09, for the League Serie A was extended to 14 teams (instead of 12) (Anyway, Pesaro 13 wins in a row=37 pts.)
** 24 pts. Is also the lowest score since 2002-03 (Bergamo 24pts): but there were then only 11 teams in serie A(now 12), and Bergamo scored 8 wins- 2losses.
** Until 2008, the serie A leaders (at halfway) used to range btw. 28-30 pts, plus occasional exploits (Novara 2007 pts.33 – 11 wins in a row!). In 2009-10 & 2010-11, the range fell to 25-24 pts.
** For sure, this may be imputed to the crisis and the fled of so many “stars” to foreign leagues;
But ….
(2) There is no hard & unquestionable evidence ITA League has declined in general terms (IMO, you may say it only for this or that team).
** In the last 2 years, 7 teams out of 12 have shown a positive balance btw. wins/losses, while until season 2008 it was more often the opposite: only 5 teams out of 12 showing a positive balance. This narrowing gap among top/bottom teams, IMO, may well be a positive asset, not a liability...
** Il you look abroad, you will notice, for example, that Polish League+ has a wider gap (4 teams have positive balance out of 10); so as the Turkish League (5 teams positive out of 12, at 11th round). This is a fact I would put forward - as a contribute to the debate about the relative strenght of major European leagues (see the Female Champion League forum)
** Opinions and criticisms, as usual, most welcomed.