Posts by Shiznut81

    couple of things i noticed vakif s mbs are way faster at the net set block higher and are way better positioned then that of ecz,kosheeleva reception is a disaster if u wonna win just serve on her i think kim had like 10+ aces today,like i said for adams i dont know how she got into this team her blocking is non existant and her scoring is no on the level most of the balls that vakif killed were over her block she was good enough only in the last set ,thaisa used to be top 3 mbs in the world what happened with her?,only boskovic seemed somewhat on the level,ecz should of kept poljak and de la cruz instead of getting adams and kosheeleva,thei blocking and reception would of been way better

    dear god what a disaster reception is non existant,they made tons of mistakes and barbollini doesnt do anything like i said he is way overvauled as a coach and i still dont get how adams even got into this team for mb she can t bloack anything at all the balls go over her every time and she can t score either seems boskovic is only 1 that can score

    he won almost all that stuff like ages ago when italy and italian teams were top 3 in the world and even back then he had awsome players in the roster so it wasnt that hard to win stuff and i find it funny u comparing him to guidetti cuase he had it way harder with nt then barbolini i m actually surprised how well guidetti has done with nt he has couched cause none of the teams had top 5 players at any given position, only 1 time barbollini won something with average team was with pomi and only cuase all other teams underperformed and that is the fact i mean i hear he is a nice guy and all but his coaching skills are no where near of guidetti s that is my opinion thought and i do think they made a mistake of signing with him,i will never understand turkish clubs and their obssesion with italian coaches,there are some good chinese,american,serbian,russian,brasilian and japanese coaches out there

    barbollini is an awfull coach like i said only reason he won cl with pomi was cause all other teams underperformed big time not cause of his skills as a coach,i agree about rezende i might add ze,didnt know it was 73 games rofl,and i dont agree about kosheleva being stronger attacker cause brankica is all about power she has same reception as kosheleva same passing same blocking she is better at digging and she is way better in serve then kosheleva and she is more consistant that is my opinion anyway, and if that gamze alikaya is that good why dont they try to run with her instead of nilay i dont get it,ecz made a big mistake by letting bahar leave imo

    well we dont know how it would work cause they never tried it we can only assume and for barbollini and him winning cl with pomi had nothing to do with his coaching but with other teams underperforming big time in final 4 but i do agree they are focusing on winning cl but even in cl they arent playing that great i think with any other coach that i mentioned ecz would be something like vakif was back when brakocevic was playing for them and when they had like 50 games without a loss there isnt any difference from vakif team back then and ecz team right now and yet ecz performs so much worse

    well to be honest i dont know much about those turkish players so i can t make a comment on them one way or another i think i recongnized only asli kalac that played in gala,but turkey is not know for mbs either so u have 2 choices imo eda and kubra they are the only ones that are high quality mbs turkey has atm to bad bahar left ecz i think she could of made a difference if she was allowed to play she can t be worse then mbs that are in the club atm,btw i think they should try with ognjenovic-boskovic-thaisa-hande-neslihan-gulden or ognjenovic-neslihan-thaisa-hande-kosheleva-gulden if ecz had any decent setter it would make ecz so much stronger in turkish league but nilay has gotten much worse with her age with second part of your post i agree but i have to stress once again they should change the coach asap to bad they went with barbollini instead of terzic or mota cause their game styles are very alike karch kiraly or yan fang would also be a good coaches for this team,for me italian coaches are way overvauled only italian coach that is really good is guidetti,rest are bit above average imo and i agree with second part of your post what good is to recieve only to not be able to kill or block a ball,ecz has to stop relying on boskovic all the freaking time,kosheleva is so incosistant,i would rather have brankica instead of her but that is just my opinion

    maja out gamze inn? who is gamze? maja is best setter in the world right now rofl and u wonna bring someone else instead of her? problem of ecz is lack of domestic players and their biggest problem in league is mbs not reception imo even thought reception is bad they could counter it with some blocking but they dont have any decent domestic mbs or oh or setters so making a functional team in turkish league is not gonna happen the reason vakifbank wins title each year is exactly cause of it,if u had a decent turkish mb a setter and maybe oh in ecz then it would be completly different story,and i do agree with rest of the people that barbolini as a coach is a disaster, he has the biggest budget of gala and he didnt do anything with that team only reason he won wch was cause of the players quality,when u have a team full of worlds best at each position u dont have to be a miracle maker in order to win stuff,althought i can t stand terzic as person and his way of coaching i think that he would be way better then barbollini for this team and i think he would make players better ,if there is 1 thing he is good at that is to make a player,each player that was in his team progressed

    in every other competition u have to play your way to final 4 only in cev cl u get final 4 spot if u pay money to host it,it is disgusting and as i said has nothing to do with sports at all,pomi won cause rest of the team underperformed big time that is the only way italian teams can ever win anything in cl and no i m not hating on italian teams there is a track record of it during the years only way they won something was when the oppossite team was playing like crap and that imo is bad,u should win cause u were better not cause other team sucked that day,just look at pomi in wch ecz squashed them in first game 3-1 and it could easily be 3-0 why? ecz was at its almost best and pomi played their best as well,in semis ecz barely won 3-2 why? cause they sucked that day and pomi was playing the same as in the first game, and u asked me a question and i m gonna ask u a question back how do u know they would qualify for final 4? even if u take chemik out there are still 5 teams that are playing way better then imoco so far in cl, and actually final 4 system should be changed as well everybody should play against everybody and then who ever has the most points wins i really dislike 1 game u are out system and that is true for all sports not just volleyball imo,and on top of that italians get to host mens final 4 as well which is a joke,best cev years were when there were 8 groups and there was none of this final 4 hosting crap

    this final 4 is a joke there are at least 6 teams that are better then imoco vakif,ecz,fener,volero,dinamo,chemik maybe even uralochka and now just beaucse they were first in the group they get to host it even though they dont have a quality to come to semis even,think it is gonna be my last year watching cev cl if nothing changes cause this is pay to win cl,u pay money u get final 4 spot it is disgusting and had nothing to do with sports what so ever and people running cev should be ashamed of themselfs if they have any honor what so ever

    Montichiari must be the most unlucky team i have ever seen in my life how many times they lost 3-1 and yet that had the quality to go to fifth set easy but due to their mistakes they payed the price and dont get my started on all the 3-2 games that they lost ,modena on other hand is in a very dissapointing spot i actually belived they would be top 3 and maybe even fight for the titel

    well there are teams from russia or turkey that are as good if not better then those teams u mentioned from serie a1 but thing is u wonna give small teams chance to play in champions league as well and that is why i desribed the way it should be done so if 2 italians team meet in cev s cl that means next year italy would have 5 teams in cl and with cev cup finalist it could go to 7 and still u would have small teams in cl even more so due to increasing of pools so teams like rc cannes and some czech or polish team that have been somewhat competitive in the past could participate and make cl way better then it is atm ,i think the problem with cev cl is that there isnt that big investment like before so the problem is money

    i said this before and i stand by my words this year champion league is the worse that has ever been the matches are mostly boring or so predictable it aint intresting to watch cev needs to change the system imo the best year was when there were 8 groups and u had way more competition they need to change how teams get their spot in champion league as well for example i would award 2 spots for teams playing in finals of champion league and 2 spots for finalist of cev cup that would play in champions league next year then 3 spots for turks,3 spots for russians,3 spots for italians ,3 spots polish,2 spots azerbaijan.2 spots france,2 spots german,1 spot serbian,1spot czech and rest should be determined by qualifications if cev really wants quality and quantity cev champions league then they would take my advice as it is this champions league is utter crap

    crovolley when did u start to watch cev cl? cause your comments are just plain and simple dumb yes cl was way better before 4-5 years ago and had more teams fighting for the potential title and the games were tougher then today on top of 3 turkish teams u had 3 teams from azerbaijan 2 were high end and 1 middle u had cannes from france 2 teams from russia 2 teams from italy and then there were not so big budget teams from czech ,poland,france,germany that gave big teams run for their money now every time a big teams plays a smaller one chances of big team wining is 100% it wasnt like that before quality has droped a lot and games aint that exiciting as before,but 4-5 years ago loads of old stars were still playing that is why the quality has droped imo and i can t take any comments from u seriously when u comment on every move samanta fabris does as godly,maybe u should leave commenting on volleyball alone cause it doesnt seem u know what u are talking about and focus on handball instead where your country is actually good

    as mutch as i like chemik police as a team they will never be a serious team unless their setter wolozs changes hers ways, she was thrashing maja ognjenovic for her sets in final 4 and she had some rights to do so ,but what she is doing in chemik now is just bad she has veljkovic which is maybe the only star in their team and she isnt using her at all ,when maja was a setter she used all players almost equally and they didnt lose from crappy teams like conegliano.i hate people that are full of them selfs just to find out they suck badly and wolosz seems like a person that is like that, and secondly chemik police needs a real good op if they want to get anywhere in cl the op they have is good for polish league but not for cl so they need to invest some money in op and maybe a better libero if it is affordable and maybe just maybe they will have a shot at the tittle,as far as i see it the biggest favourites for final 4 are fener vakif ezc and volero just by looking throw names in squads with possibility of dinamo moscow making a surprise,seems cl droped a lot in quality over the last 3-4 years,there were more teams that could beat top teams before then there is now and it seems the quality of volleyball had decreased as well

    antonijevic is almost as good as she was in rc cannes althought u can see it she it very carefull and not going her full speed cause she is afraid of getting an anjury and yes they should of kept antonijevic in volero she is ebtter then both their setters