btw...FB made 16, EcV 13 reception errors ...especially both liberos were bad...
do you know the website where i can see the turlish league stats?
btw...FB made 16, EcV 13 reception errors ...especially both liberos were bad...
do you know the website where i can see the turlish league stats?
pesaro it was mari who choked in the crucial games, moscow? we know very well that there are only a few non russian players who could survive there so its not ony costa who failed vakifbank? she was already way past her prime.
kazan? larsson has her best season, borisenko finally ccame to her senses and gamova was very determined to win, am not saying that del cor didnt help but the win is more influenced by larsson and gamova
costagrande sucked when she got older but in mid 2000's she to me was a top 5 oh
your reply is meaning less cause i already ignored you
with 2 teams on nearly identical levels 1 player performing poorly can tilt the balance favorable to the other side and vakif last year with huge potential? on paper maybe but during the whole tournament kazan was performing better than them
the reason why kazan won the cl was not because vakif was tired they won because costagrande sucked
grothues is not needed so much for the french tournament but will be ciritcal for cl
it happened twice so its not chance.... LMAO the spurs lost twice against the blazers and yet they won the title
well if eda is healthy, alll fener will ever need from dicle is blocks
i only like kubra among the 3 mentioned she should be the starter at least in the turkish league
if lucia does not play this season ill be scared since i dont trust kristin that much while it is questionable if meliha can play well in the payoffs
why do you need mvp for a single match? unless this is a week long event and i wouldnt give weight too much on this contest since the club season hasnt started yet plus teams have until..... april to perfet their play
what disappearance? the one when she left rabita?
it's close but murphy still has the edge mmmn about .1? although if you really asked me who among the final 4 teams should get the mvp even if they did not win then my vote goes to zhu ting
"murphy did good in wch overall" yes better than hill who was only mvp for the final match
one team beating the other is not impressive the question is how many times
i agree that japan is not better than brazil, usa, russia but i dont know for turkey and serbia of course we could say that if serbia did not have injury issues they might be one of the top teams but there's no way of confirming that if they do not play as a complete team
to me: russia's blocking from the middles and dogs wass the problem, of course gamova was [art of it but i dont think it had a big effect since kosheleva played well and if goncharova was only in the opp then they'll both ttake care of the attacks
so because of tradition they dont need to have capable middles then
"podskalnaya or zaryazhko were the weakest points and this damaged the defense of russia that much?" hmn if it is doubtful that the two are to be blamed what then is the true problem?
just because your doing the same things for decades does not mean it will be successful forever