While I agree that there is huge distinction between current Boskovic's role and Egonu's, and if there is 1-1 comparison we should compare Egonu's performance with Markova and Boskovic with second option of Milano where tbh i see clear winners in favour of Vakif. Anyway i see that comparisons rather useless.
What should be the fair assesment is why Boskovic is second option. Yeah i believe that with more rythm Boskovic would play better but will it be on Markova's level? Or more importantly if she is the first option will the sum of Markova+Boskovic remain the same as now. Maybe there is a room for introspection that while Boskovic is far from done player as some irrational individuals here believe, (us) her fans need to consider that she will need to suit this new role and deliver better, if not i personally find that absurd and selfish. Yeah it is hard to kill OOS balls getting them in 10 points span, i agree, but the perfect balance between Markova and Boskovic in high intense matches is almost impossible to accomplish, and in late 4th set and 5th, Boskovic from few sets that she got, scored 0.