We aren't considering it. At least I'm not. I'm talking about Wlazły in the team at all. Not that he will be in starting 6 at once, additionally as a receiver. I don't want to see him as a receiver 'cause the guy is simply unhappy on this position and I know Andrea won't do that to him. Kurek and Winiarski are simply "unmovable" from the starting six. And knowing Andrea Bartman will be still the first OPP. It could look like with setter position, couldn't? Remember Żygadło and everyone talking that when Zagumny will be back Łukasz will be that one who will sit on bench? And what Andrea did? He sat Guma on the bench. So we will see... But having Wlazły on the bench isn't a stupid idea at all since as you wrote Bartman is "inconsistent". For me Bartman already proved he is consistent enough to be the first. Every player can have weaker moments. In these moments I prefer to see Wlazły saving our asses than Jarosz.
Or just not risk and let Bartman save your asses and let Wlaszly do the most work as a starter.
I mean, I see your point. Probably AA will going to do just that - make Wlaszly earn his spot by introducing him slowly to the games. But in time, I think it'd be unwise to put him on the bench, he's clearly the better of the two, not that Bartman is weak or sth. The thing with Zagumny is a bit different, cause the setter is the most important part of the machine and the other guys had made a connection with Zygadlo. I expect Guma a starter this year, though.
