I watched the last 3 sets. Apparently Piazza's invention is totally inefficient now when the element of surprise and no analysis by the opponent teams is gone. So, it's good that he is not that stubborn donkey. Also, I respect the decision to bring back Sokolov in the game when Grbic asked for it. Some other coaches would interpret that as questioning the coach's authority (no matter by whom, player like Grbic or not) and would not make the change out of spite. But Sokolov played bad, he was not the one who won the tiebreak, although he made the last point. He was inefficient, had lots of ups and downs. It was one of his bad days, and a great player he is, he spiked around 4-5 ppg in one of his bad days. The guy who won the tie-break was Wijsmans with his immense serves. Absolute bombs!
And Cuneo is definitely weaker than Cuneo 3-4 years ago.
Wijsmans and Grbic are a lot older. Kohut and Rossi are jokes. Henno then was better than De Pandis now (although the difference is not that big and De Pandis should be NT starter!), let's say Sokolov = Nikolov (although Nikolov is classier and better technically, but let's add the age variable), Parodi was a monster when he played in Cuneo, Ngapeth is too unstable.
I expect really interesting games between Piacenza and Macerata. With the current form of Macerata, I guess Piacenza are favourites, but the fucking refs are constantly pushing Macerata forward, they also made some bad decisions in key points in favour of Macerata in the second game vs Latina!
I expect that Trento will sweep Cuneo, however I wouldn't like it so.