FINAL - Game 1
CONEGLIANO - SCANDICCI 2-3
Haak 34, Plummer 15, Lubian 13 / Antropova 31, Zhu 16, Herbots 14
https://www.legavolleyfemminil…enter/746906/statistiche/
MVP: Antropova
FINAL - Game 1
CONEGLIANO - SCANDICCI 2-3
Haak 34, Plummer 15, Lubian 13 / Antropova 31, Zhu 16, Herbots 14
https://www.legavolleyfemminil…enter/746906/statistiche/
MVP: Antropova
Link for Scandicci vs Conegliano: https://m.vk.com/video-211669815_456243647
Acetropova with yet another ace some minute ago.
I know that Maja is a big liability in block, but Barbolini ruined everything with this double sub.
I know that Maja is a big liability in block, but Barbolini ruined everything with this double sub.
I think it's not just about blocking, he's probably trying to keep her as fresh as possible, especially after a five set match.
Blocking from Scandicci looks good so far. They got the first lead with a couple of touches against Plummer and now they can get an early lead because of that.
I know that Maja is a big liability in block, but Barbolini ruined everything with this double sub.
Their double sub made good impact in the series against Milano, but having Diop at the front row is always a big risk as her attack too unreliable. I would rather have her as a serving sub instead.
I can't watch the match but I'm keeping up with the scoresheet, who was serving when Scandicci went from 17-22 to 24-22?
I think it's not just about blocking, he's probably trying to keep her as fresh as possible, especially after a five set match.
They almost loose a set because of that, so definitely he should be careful with that and at least put Ruddins instead of Dioup, girls is not for this level (at lest not yet).
But anyway, what a comeback from Scandicci.
Another unbelievable turnaround by Scandicci Hope they can keep this momentum to win again!!
I can't watch the match but I'm keeping up with the scoresheet, who was serving when Scandicci went from 17-22 to 24-22?
Maja
I can't watch the match but I'm keeping up with the scoresheet, who was serving when Scandicci went from 17-22 to 24-22?
Ognjenovic
I can't watch the match but I'm keeping up with the scoresheet, who was serving when Scandicci went from 17-22 to 24-22?
Maja, LoL, i mean she is underrated server, she is perfectly placing her serve, but this time it was more about block defense, serve wasn't anything special.
It was Maja. But the weird thing is that most of them were good passes? Like Imoco just fell apart, Haak hitting error, Lubian touching the net, Lanier hitting straight into the block and suddenly the lead was gone.
Imoco has been very un-Imocolike in this series so far. And I hope it stays like this lol
Antropova had 10 pts in the first set
They almost loose a set because of that, so definitely he should be careful with that and at least put Ruddins instead of Dioup, girls is not for this level (at lest not yet).
But anyway, what a comeback from Scandicci.
Usually it works better than that. Clearly you want Ognjenović in as much as possible, but nowadays you have to sip her.
Great comeback, I'm bit surprised to see Conegliano being the messier team in a crucial phase once again.
Maja, LoL, i mean she is underrated server, she is perfectly placing her serve, but this time it was more about block defense, serve wasn't anything special.
Agree - her serves are very tactical, precise and with great variation.
I think Imoco is going to change the serving target to Parrochiale now
Usually it works better than that. Clearly you want Ognjenović in as much as possible, but nowadays you have to sip her.
Great comeback, I'm bit surprised to see Conegliano being the messier team in a crucial phase once again.
Yeah i see that you are going in that way, but you are wrong, it is not about Ognjenovic, it is actually about Antropova, they need her and puting Diop in is sensless at this stage, i mean i'm not even evaluating the double sub in general for Scandicci just said that it was really bad move which is like a fact as they lost 6 points in a row after that.
I think Imoco is going to change the serving target to Parrochiale now
Yep. And it's working.