USA Women's NT 2021

    Hancock > Carlini.
    One is going to Tokyo and another is staying home.


    Hancock even showed better performance than Poulter, even though Poulter is better setter.

    Thompson was our top scorer, with 4.6 points/set, Drews was at 3.9 (adjusted for the doub sub)


    JT had a .385 efficiency, Drews was .360 and both MBH and Larson were at .350. (we wont talk about Krob .219 or Hill .171)


    Haleigh hit .577 (which is absurd) and Chi was at .538. Foluke was .438.

    Quote from avid

    Thompson was our top scorer, with 4.6 points/set, Drews was at 3.9 (adjusted for the doub sub)


    JT had a .385 efficiency, Drews was .360 and both MBH and Larson were at .350. (we wont talk about Krob .219 or Hill .171)


    Haleigh hit .577 (which is absurd) and Chi was at .538. Foluke was .438.

    Hill's percentage is fine since she only played 3x out of 15 matches but for krob?

    I don't like this efficiency ratio, I prefer the (very) old format, which only accounts for points/spikes and do not consider the errors.

    Hill's % should be a lot higher if she played only 3 games... If she was able to do worst with less attempts than the other ones, it's everything but fine

    Quote from avid

    it’s an American thing. We use it. Lol


    we don’t see termination (points/attempts) here

    Yes, and you like to use decimals instead of percentage. Americans are confusing sometimes :lol:

    Quote from sloth

    Hill's % should be a lot higher if she played only 3 games... If she was able to do worst with less attempts than the other ones, it's everything but fine

    Yes, but you will have to look for other factor as well. If she was given more or at least same opportunity to play and develop and work with that connection isn't that's the main concern here? Mbh wasn't doing well during her 1st or 2nd game even krob wasn't doing well the fact that she was given alot of opportunity.


    If this vnl is to evaluate who will start and doesn't matter win or lose. Shouldn't be fair if they given same amount of playing time? And by end of week 5 see who had better performance.


    No, because prior to VNL. They already have decisions on who will play, roster for Olympic and their role. Is that even fair and worth to give your 100% and compete knowing that whatever your performance for this match it won't matter because they already have the decision.

    Quote from Kostlich

    Yes, but you will have to look for other factor as well. If she was given more or at least same opportunity to play and develop and work with that connection isn't that's the main concern here? Mbh wasn't doing well during her 1st or 2nd game even krob wasn't doing well the fact that she was given alot of opportunity.


    If this vnl is to evaluate who will start and doesn't matter win or lose. Shouldn't be fair if they given same amount of playing time? And by end of week 5 see who had better performance.


    No, because prior to VNL. They already have decisions on who will play, roster for Olympic and their role. Is that even fair and worth to give your 100% and compete knowing that whatever your performance for this match it won't matter because they already have the decision.

    In Kim's case, she wants it to not matter, because she never did well :lol:


    USA has a mess, but its a mess they made so *shrug* lol

    Quote from Kostlich

    Is that even fair and worth to give your 100% and compete knowing that whatever your performance for this match it won't matter because they already have the decision.

    Ab-so-fucking-lutely :!: If you don't, you should take up pilates for exercise and quick quit playing volleyball

    Quote from sitenoise

    Ab-so-fucking-lutely :!: If you don't, you should take up pilates for exercise and quick playing volleyball

    Look what happened to swp stans they were disappointed because of her "lucky" performance against brazil still doesn't matter because usa released the names after few matches just to clarify to everyone that they already have names and they don't care if your favorite player will win against bazil 😂. That's actually a slap.

    Quote from Kostlich

    Look what happened to swp stans they were disappointed because of her "lucky" performance against brazil still doesn't matter because usa released the names after few matches just to clarify to everyone that they already have names and they don't care if your favorite player will win against bazil 😂. That's actually a slap.

    maybe, maybe not. I don't know, because I can't follow your train of thought. My brain is small :)