Maybe they have been the best but the only 2 good ones is not fair. They both have done great but they are also both lucky to play in teams with good passing and good attackers in every position. How can you compare them fairly to setters who have to work with terrible reception or only one reliable attacker? It's like a different job. For example if they had played for Bauru maybe they wouldn't have done as good a job as Fabiola this season, who knows?
Well Ok...I guess I should compare them only with the setter from the top teams.
Vakifbank, Vitra, Novara all have good reception and all wing spikers and middles are NT members and the best in the world. And still their setters are terrible. I guess we can only make a case for Maja and Malinov as they play with bad reception.
Macris and Woloz does not have a dominant OPP. Fabris and Bruna are solid but not even close to Egonu-Boskovic-Haak-Sloetjes. They don`t have a to go player....which means they must think and actually create a play...while all the other setters can simply set Egonu-Boskovic,Zhu etc. Now imagine if they did not have the dominant player and had to actually think and create a play?? That would be even more messy....