Adding to the Malygina discussion, even if she plays MB in NT I doubt she can compete with Koroleva in attack as the former is as slow as a turtle.. so her main purpose will be blocking due to her 'great height' but then Fetisova is already there and is second-to-none in this element For this reason, I would take Kotova as third MB to Tokyo, she is a pretty balanced MB and at least can be useful as serving specialist
the problem is that the players who we like today, they have played in Uralochka (Koroleva, Enina, Evdokimova, Kotova). Let's not forget, Karpol had a big impact on those players. I wonder if Koroleva would have played well today if she hadn't played in Uralochka.
I'm not a fan of Malygina but Goncharova, Kosheleva said something like this, there are some players who are very good at training "behind the scenes" but don't perform well on the court because they don't get supports/tactics from coaches (is she one of these players?), because Malygina is not the only tall player in the Russian league. Well, that's why I don't want to criticize because maybe he has a valid explanation.